You can't really believe?

Hey dippy...
You forgot to mention about the gold you claimed was detected!!

And you call me a "proven" liar?    Based on your word?? The one who fakes finds??


I'm not the one putting up fake detected gold!!

In your usual form though, attempting to discredit with vitriol!!

I am putting up Dippy....Post after post after post after post.....

Chemicals have nothing to do with chemistry
What is a simple definition of chemistry?
Chemistry is the study of matter, analysing its structure, properties and behaviour to see what happens when they change in chemical reactions.


A chemical is a substance that always has the same composition and properties wherever it is found. Since matter is anything that has mass and volume, chemicals are the substances that make up all matter including the air we breathe, the water we drink, or the desk that you're sitting. If you think about it, everything is chemicals.

Ps. A tertiary qualification is not a Batchelor degree or Doctorate and is easily achieved by anybody with half a brain!

DP still down...Must be killing you Dippy not being able to access your detector knowledge!!

Why do you keep changing your posts dippy? Without acknowledging your edits?

Bendigo Tafe wasn't mentioned in your first draft, you just said chemicals had nothing to do with chemistry!?

Could it have been after you read my reply??

Posted 10.03   last edit 10.31  yet no mention of what you edited!!

What a jackass you are!

Edit: A quick look back over all your posts about this forum sees edits you've made long after I've replied here in an effort to make yourself look less stupid!! (impossible!!)
That's on the threads you haven't hidden or deleted. It's ok, I know a few of your members, I'll just get one to give me access to their account again if I need to look.

Couldn't help notice you made a new member....

You've been saved Dippy...!!

DP is back up!!

Now you don't have to put up posts about TV and Porn!!

Last one for Dr Dippy..

In your words.."these models  predictions or estimates or guesses as dopey dave calls them were  very close to what actually happened!! ::62::
doug ::419::"

As I have clearly stated in all my comments.. A good guess is not a fact, coming close after the fact also does not make it a fact at the time of the estimate.

So coming close as you put it, means they were wrong!!

2+2=5 as an estimate would be wrong..even if it's close. A good estimate, but not a fact.

You have a nice day now.

Hey Dipshit..

I now have SC of your members only vitriol and slander about me.!

Nice to know you think so much about me, and waste so much time trying to convince your tiny audience.

I'm flattered.

Ps.Check your logs all you like..

I told you days ago I had access....

Hey dippy...

I hope you got permission to post non public YouTube video??

Otherwise you'd be a hypocrite!!

I'd be sucking up to Simon, not criticising...

edit: In your opinion Dippy? How often do you detect in NZ in order to have any idea??? Have you ever owned or used any of the machines you mention?? What a buffoon!

Hey Dippy..lol
You do realise that the reason the 6000 flew off the shelves (despite it's faults) was because people (AKA your fellow detectorists) wanted a small gold detector???

And the Axiom was also designed to find small gold!....

Funny how you weren't waffling about VLF machines then...
Are you trying to suck up to Howard because he posted???
Let him get back to giving those that bought one, a usable QED please.

The last thing Howard and QED owners need, is to have you hold things up, or be tarnished by you and your vitriol.

Poor Dippy... what was it you said..?!
"because you can measure the reactive component  of the  RX"

And yet this PI (E1500) does just that and offers a target ID, not just discrimination(I know discrimination is your specialty!!)...

Do you really have any idea what crap you sprout????!!

You discriminated with your Pick???????? SO WHY FAKE YOUR FINDS?????


Shows what a tosser you are and what utter crap you waffle!!

The idea is to know so you don't have to dig?

You've seen the disc and target ID at work on a mono PI

But you want me to explain how?? I thought you know everything!!  

edit: Are you implying I don't know what tx/rx means?
What were your qualifications again?
The X means nothing idiot!!

What a moron yo are Dippy!!

You asked what RX means then prattle on about something you've copied without quoting your source.

TX and RX are abbreviations for Transmit and Receive, respectively.  

And now you know all about the Axiom..Dippy Dud and his kiss of death.
edit:(phew just another link)

Hey Dippy!

Where's my post about you being unable to discriminate the difference  between right and wrong, and your need to fake finds?


Ps. I know enough about detecting to find gold and not need to fake!!
Keeping a detector in the cupboard, doesn't make you a detectorist!! You have to use it!!!
Your old detector is like you, out of date and obsolete.  

Pps. That's why nobody guest posts with you Dippy, you take all day even if you're online when I post, you actually research a reply before you put a guest post up! That's assuming you don't hide the thread!

Have a look at the times Dippy!! You are about as spontaneous and intelligent as mud.
Waffling on about what you've read while never actually using any detector yourself. While I could read up on the specifics of detecting
electronic functions, I have no need. Just like most people who drive a car couldn't tell you the 4 strokes of an engine, but they can drive. Anything else they call a mechanic. Knowing the basics is more than enough for me despite your unqualified statements. You seem to think because you say it it is true!! I have a tertiary level II in electronics and computer networking, Austel qualified as well as 30 yrs installing alarms, cctv, phone and computer systems.

Out of curiosity what are your electrical/electronic qualifications again?

Hey Dippy...

you said " To discriminate with high fidelity you need both  the R and X components (phase shift)"

Who said anything about HiFi??
High fidelity (often shortened to Hi-Fi or HiFi) is the high-quality reproduction of sound.

And please enlighten me as to what the X component is in TX/RX? Idiot!!

Edit: in case you don't remember your question..
You said "Tells us in the Rx signal of a vlf what is R and what is X"

Hey Dippy..lol
Have you noticed you've been promoting ML machines and Vlf over the new E1500?
Even though you've never used any of them!?

What are you first three words of your reply??? "THAT IS CORRECT" As I knew I was.
Then you start waffling on about detector functions from detectors that aren't the E1500, and how you can't do this or that because that's what it says in the posts about ML PI technology.

So while what you are prattling about (quoting ) may be correct with regards to the tech at the time.
This is NEW tech and circuitry you know nothing about!
Don't know whose arse you're trying to blow smoke up with the irrelevant tech talk, but I do know the average Joe Blow couldn't care less, and neither could I.

Well done once again in turning a reasonable post about a new detector, into one of your pathetic and childish attempts to prove you're smarter than everybody else, when everyone else, already knows you're not.

Shit Dippy, way to try and back pedal

When questioned about your use of the words "High Fidelity" and their relevance.

You stated, "ps fidelity in my posts you idiot means accuracy nothing to do with audio!!!! "

Of course we all know that Fidelity really means. fidelity noun [ U ] (LOYALTY)

High fidelity, means a faithful reproduction!
eg. high fidelity
noun [ U ]
UK /ˌhaɪ fɪˈdel.ə.ti/ US /ˌhaɪ fɪˈdel.ə.t̬i/
(abbreviation hi-fi)

"the production by electrical equipment of very good quality sound that is as similar as possible to the original sound:"

Keep waffling Dippy..

You idiot you simply cannot accurately discriminate ferrous / non ferrous targets using a MONO coil which the E1500 can only use!!!! Basic em physics will tell you why!!! Now prove me wrong moron!

doug wrote:

You idiot  you simply cannot accurately discriminate  ferrous / non  ferrous targets  using a MONO coil which the E1500 can only use!!!! Basic em physics will tell  you why!!!   Now prove me wrong moron!

Poor dippy, you keep trying to turn conversations your way and claim some sort of moral victory.

Nobody has said anything about accuracy (though how good it is is yet to be proven) or high fidelity except you.

The fact is it has a working system! Prove me wrong!!

Ps. Discriminating with a visual display (target ID) is still discriminating. Just not the same as you keep crapping on about.

Blah blah blah Dippy.

It's discrimination Period. Whether it's up to your imaginary standards is irrelevant.

As is posting on your Forum. You put multiple posts late and out of context, you fail to post others at all. It's like you're trying to manipulate the conversation...

Ps. Funny how you try and call me out on everything except your FAKE DETECTOR FINDS!!


Edit:Was this supposed to be with an SD right? Bits small compared to the shotgun pellet sitting on top?
I'd be lucky to pull some of them with the Zed and 12" Zedsearch...And I pick up a lot of small gold.

"it's discrimination Period. Whether it's up to your imaginary standards is irrelevant"
But what use is it if it can,t reliably discriminate iron junk from non ferrous because it lacks the the critical information in the receive signal because the E1500 can only use a mono coil!!!!! At the beach the E1500 digital discrim will be useful but in the goldfields IMO it will be useless simply because most gold will give a digital readout similar to a lot of iron junk!!!!!

I found all most my gold with vlf detectors long before he SD came out in about 1990! Can,t you get anything right?

doug wrote:

"it's discrimination Period. Whether it's up to your imaginary standards is irrelevant"
But what use is it if it can,t reliably discriminate iron junk from  non ferrous because it lacks the the critical information in the receive signal because the E1500 can only use a mono coil!!!!! At the beach the  E1500  digital   discrim will be useful  but in the goldfields  IMO it will be useless simply because most gold will give a digital readout similar  to a  lot of   iron  junk!!!!!

What do you care Dippy? You don't detect or have any idea about those that do!!
It doesn't claim "Iron Reject" !! Which is what you keep ranting about as discrimination.
Nobody was talking about "Iron Reject" except you trying to steer things again!!
It has discrimination, that's it! Those in the field will be able to utilise sound and target ID and with experience minimise digs.
I know of many who are able with sound alone. But if in doubt...Dig!
Not information I would expect you to know with a detector in the cupboard!!
Continued effort to steer away from what a fraud you are and your FAKE FINDS is pathetic.  

doug wrote:

 I found all most my gold with vlf detectors long before he SD came out in about 1990! Can,t you get anything right?

Too late to change your story now Dippy!!
Out of curiosity though, why would you leave a pellet in your finds? Along with the other bits of non gold that can be seen?
Can't wait to hear your bullshit flow....

Ps. So is it all your gold, or most of your gold...You seem confused, as am I, because I thought you found all of your gold mining?

doug wrote:

 I found all most my gold with vlf detectors long before he SD came out in about 1990! Can,t you get anything right?

So you haven't found any gold with a PI detector Dippy? Or Just very Little?
So where does your claim in PI detecting expertise come from?

So many holes in your stories they wouldn't hold spaghetti!
So you can understand Dippy, that's more holes than a colander!

Wow "Strawman" (your new name Dippy)
When Garrett have a machine to match in the same price range...$$$

Videos of E1500 first finds out...
And all you can do is continue to try and prove why you think it won't work, and waffle on about the limited tech knowledge you've read.
Thankfully people like Simon are out there using machines, to offer REAL feedback, instead of a couch expert like you.



Follow up commentary..
https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/25299-first-gold-nugget-finds-with-the-algoforce-e1500/#comments